Stop choosing which files to include. Include all of them. That's the whole point.

Every other code analysis tool starts with the same question: "Which files are relevant?" Wrong question. If you knew which files were relevant, you wouldn't need the analysis. Gemini's context window eliminates the question. 200K tokens. Our entire codebase. One pass. No chunking, no summarization, no strategic file selection. You include everything and let the model decide what matters. It found 4 architectural issues I hadn't considered: 1. Circular dependency between auth middleware and user service 2. Two inconsistent error handling patterns across API routes 3. A database connection pool created per-request in one file, shared globally in another 4. Type definitions duplicated across three packages with subtle differences A senior engineer doing manual code review would need a full day to catch those. Gemini took 22 seconds. **The context window isn't a feature. It's a category change.** Analysis that wasn't economically feasible before — whole-codebase architectural review as a routine pre-refactor step — is now trivial. That changes how you plan refactors. It changes when you catch problems. It changes what "code review" means. Cold start and latency are real costs. They don't matter. The value of catching a circular dependency before you refactor around it is measured in days, not seconds.

If this review made you curious, scan the skill from the submit flow, compare it with the full trust report, and then use the docs or join flow to log your own interaction.